Blog
Céline Dostaler
Freedom Convoy Protesters: Charges, Defences, Sentences, and Legal Outcomes
The Freedom Convoy protests that took place in Ottawa in early 2022 remain one of the most significant public demonstrations in recent Canadian history. Originally organized as a movement against COVID-19 restrictions and vaccine mandates, the convoy grew into a broader protest against government overreach, sparking legal challenges, political debates, and numerous criminal charges.
In the aftermath of the protests, many demonstrators and organizers faced criminal charges, legal proceedings, and sentences. Some have successfully defended themselves, while others continue to fight their cases in court.
This blog post explores:
- The charges convoy protesters have faced
- The sentences handed down by the courts
- The legal defences used
- The successes and key legal victories
- What this means for future protests and civil liberties in Canada
What Charges Did Freedom Convoy Protesters Face?
Many participants and leaders of the Freedom Convoy were charged with various criminal offenses under Canada’s Criminal Code. The most common charges include:
1. Mischief (Criminal Code Section 430)
- Many protesters were charged with mischief, which refers to interfering with the lawful use, enjoyment, or operation of property.
- This charge was often applied to blocking roads, honking excessively, and disrupting businesses in downtown Ottawa.
2. Counselling to Commit Mischief
- Some protest leaders were accused of encouraging others to participate in acts of mischief, such as blocking streets or refusing to leave when ordered by police.
3. Obstructing Police (Criminal Code Section 129)
- Some individuals were charged with obstructing police officers by refusing to comply with orders, resisting arrest, or physically interfering with law enforcement operations.
4. Disobeying Court Orders
- When courts issued injunctions to stop the excessive honking or blockades, some protesters refused to comply, leading to additional charges.
5. Intimidation (Criminal Code Section 423)
- Some organizers and participants were charged with intimidation for allegedly pressuring businesses, public officials, or law enforcement to change their actions.
6. Weapons-Related Charges
- A small number of individuals associated with the protests faced weapons-related offenses, though these were not widely reported among the majority of demonstrators.
What Sentences Have Been Given to Freedom Convoy Protesters?
1. Pat King
A prominent organizer of the Freedom Convoy, Pat King was found guilty on five counts, including:
- Mischief
- Disobeying a court order
However, he was acquitted on more serious charges, including intimidation and obstructing police.
His sentencing is scheduled for February 7, 2025, and he faces a potential prison sentence of up to 10 years.
2. Tamara Lich and Chris Barber
- Both were key organizers of the Freedom Convoy and faced charges of mischief, intimidation, and counselling others to commit offenses.
- Their trial concluded in late 2024, but the verdicts are expected on March 12, 2025.
- If convicted, they could face significant fines or jail time.
3. Randy Hillier
- Former Ontario MPP Randy Hillier was charged with multiple offenses related to his participation in the protests.
- However, in November 2024, a judge stayed all charges against him because the case had taken too long to go to trial, violating his right to a speedy trial under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
4. Other Protesters
- Many individual protesters pleaded guilty to minor offenses and received fines, probation, or community service instead of jail time.
- Others are still fighting their charges in court.
What Were the Legal Defences Used?
Several defence strategies have been used by convoy protesters in court.
1. Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Sections 2 and 7)
- Many defence lawyers have argued that protesting is a fundamental right under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which protects freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
- Some also argued that the government’s use of the Emergencies Act to remove protesters violated Charter rights.
2. Lack of Criminal Intent
- Some defendants argued that they did not intend to commit crimes but rather engaged in peaceful protest.
- Lawyers emphasized that peaceful protesting should not be classified as criminal mischief.
3. Unlawful Arrests & Police Overreach
- Some protesters claimed that they were unlawfully arrested without proper warnings.
- Defence teams questioned whether police used excessive force or arrested individuals without just cause.
4. Challenging the Evidence
- In some cases, defence lawyers challenged video footage, social media posts, and police reports as incomplete or misleading evidence.
What Legal Successes Have Convoy Protesters Had?
1. Charges Dropped Due to Trial Delays
- As seen in Randy Hillier’s case, lengthy delays in bringing cases to trial led to charges being stayed (dropped) due to violations of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time.
2. Case Dismissed Over Charter Violations
- In one case, Ben Spicer, a protester arrested in Ottawa, had all charges dismissed because police had secretly recorded him in custody, which the court ruled as a violation of his Charter rights.
3. Lower Sentences for Many Protesters
- Some individuals initially facing serious charges like mischief or intimidation received only fines or probation instead of jail time.
- This outcome suggests that courts recognized the political nature of the protests and did not impose overly harsh penalties on all demonstrators.
4. Court Challenges Against the Emergencies Act
- Legal challenges against the federal government’s use of the Emergencies Act continue. If successful, these cases could set a legal precedent restricting future government crackdowns on protests.
What Does This Mean for Future Protests in Canada?
The legal battles surrounding the Freedom Convoy protests have long-term implications for protest rights in Canada. Key takeaways include:
- Protesters can be charged with criminal offenses if demonstrations disrupt public spaces or businesses.
- The Charter of Rights and Freedoms remains a critical defence tool for those accused of crimes related to protests.
- Lengthy trial delays can lead to charges being dropped.
- Government overreach, such as the use of the Emergencies Act, will likely be challenged in future protests.
While some Freedom Convoy protesters have been convicted, others have successfully defended their actions in court, setting important legal precedents for civil liberties in Canada.
Have You Been Charged in Connection to a Protest? Get Legal Help Today
If you or someone you know has been charged with offenses related to the Freedom Convoy or any other protest, it is essential to get experienced legal representation.
